that is the question. Where do you stand on the new generation TV sets needed to watch films and live action such as the Premiership in 3D? I’m sticking with my vintage 2D box, thanks; £2,000+ is serious wedge for the debatable thrill of experiencing balls that appear to fly out of the screen at you, and as for a 3D close-up of John Terry’s dubious tackle, foul! Introduced as a novelty back in the 1950s, it’s only thanks to recent technological leaps that 3D has finally become a viable proposition. But strip away the special effects and would the overhyped Avatar have had so much as a sniff at an Oscar nomination? Give me an engaging storyline with complex (non-blue) characters every time. Besides, if the requisite spectacle frames required ain’t Gucci, I’m not wearing ‘em! Still, some Hollywood stars might welcome the implications of the new technology, not that the likes of Vinnie Jones or Shia Le Boeuf’s performances could ever be deemed one dimensional.
No comments:
Post a Comment